Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has a general score of 80, which is slightly better than Motorola DROID Turbo's 77.9 overall score. Google Pixel 3's body is noticeably newer, somewhat lighter and way thinner than Motorola DROID Turbo. The Motorola DROID Turbo has just a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster) and 1 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics processor.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a much better display than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px and more pixels per inch in the screen. Motorola DROID Turbo has a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3, because although it has slower 24 fps video frame rate and a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a way more MP back camera.
The Google Pixel 3 and the Motorola DROID Turbo both feature similar storage capacity for apps and games, both of them have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola DROID Turbo has better battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity instead of 2915mAh.
Google Pixel 3 costs more than Motorola DROID Turbo, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.