Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 439 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has a score of 80, which is just a bit better than Moto G Stylus's 79.7 overall score. Although the Google Pixel 3 is older than the Moto G Stylus, it's construction is thinner and much lighter. Google Pixel 3 features a little better processing power than Moto G Stylus. Both have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores.
The Google Pixel 3 features a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little greater screen density. The Moto G Stylus features a much better camera than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Moto G Stylus also has a much better 48 MP resolution back facing camera, a larger aperture and a way bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Moto G Stylus counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Moto G Stylus has a way better battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 37 percent more battery size.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Google Pixel 3 is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.