Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-06-06 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is a bit better than the Moto Z4, having an 80 score against 79.8. Even though the Google Pixel 3 and the Moto Z4 were released with only 8 months difference, the Google Pixel 3 body is a little thicker but somewhat lighter. Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit faster processor than Moto Z4. Both have a 4 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores.
The Google Pixel 3 has a bit more vivid display than Moto Z4, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little bit worse 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little bit higher number of pixels in each screen inch. The Motorola Moto Z4 takes better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Moto Z4 also has a larger diafragm aperture, a camera with much more megapixels and a lot bigger back camera sensor which provides a way higher image and video quality.
The Moto Z4 has a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage. Motorola Moto Z4 features greater battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has 3600mAh of battery capacity instead of 2915mAh.
The Google Pixel 3 is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.