Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android |
| 2018-10-18 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | TFT |
| 439 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 is slightly better than Google Pixel 3, with a global score of 84.7 against 80. Even though Samsung Galaxy A32 is way newer than Google Pixel 3, it's much heavier and somewhat thicker. The Google Pixel 3 has a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A32. They have 4 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core CPU.
The Google Pixel 3 has a brighter screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot more pixels per inch in the display and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2160. Galaxy A32 features a way bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy A32 also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A32 captures much clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a back facing camera with lot more megapixels.
Galaxy A32 counts with a really longer battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.