Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-06-20 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A60 is just a bit better than Google Pixel 3, getting a score of 82.3 against 80. The Samsung Galaxy A60 body has the same thickness than the Google Pixel 3, but it is somewhat heavier. The Google Pixel 3 counts with just a little better performance than Galaxy A60, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Google Pixel 3 has a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 and a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per screen inch. Samsung Galaxy A60 has a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a tinier sensor which offers a worse image and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A60 also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photography and videos and a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A60 has much more memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has more internal storage. Galaxy A60 features a bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 17% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.