Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2020-06-19 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 439 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G has an overall score of 91.8, which is much better than the Google Pixel 3's global score of 80. The Galaxy A71 5G construction is newer, but way heavier and just a little bit thicker than Google Pixel 3. Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2160 and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater amount of pixels per screen inch.
The Galaxy A71 5G's CPU is just as good as Google Pixel 3's CPU, and although the Galaxy A71 5G has 2 GB more RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a much better memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a SD card slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy A71 5G has a way better battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2915mAh. The Galaxy A71 5G takes much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same video quality, the same 30 fps video frame rate and a same size aperture, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a way more MP back-facing camera and a way larger sensor.
Although Galaxy A71 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 3. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy A71 5G, otherwise you can save some money and get the Google Pixel 3, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.