Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-05-29 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A80 has a general score of 84.9, which is slightly better than Google Pixel 3's score of 80. Although Samsung Galaxy A80 is better than Google Pixel 3, it must be noted that it's also thicker and way heavier. Google Pixel 3 counts with a little faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A80, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Google Pixel 3 counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy A80, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2160px resolution, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel quantity per display inch. Samsung Galaxy A80 features a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A80 takes much better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and a much bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A80 features longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 3700mAh battery capacity against 2915mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.