Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android |
| 2018-10-18 | 2019-09-04 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A90 5G has a general score of 90.5, which is much better than Google Pixel 3's 80 overall score. Galaxy A90 5G's design is newer than Google Pixel 3's, although it's noticeably heavier and a bit thicker. The Google Pixel 3 has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2160px resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit better screen pixel density.
The Galaxy A90 5G features a little faster processing unit than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A90 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A90 5G features a better camera than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a way bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a really longer battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 54% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.