Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-10-18 | 2017-02-24 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a global score of 81, which is slightly better than Google Pixel 3's global score of 80. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro construction is somewhat thinner than Google Pixel 3, but it's heavier and was released just a bit further than a year before. The Google Pixel 3 features a little bit better performance than Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Google Pixel 3 features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2160 resolution and a bit greater screen density. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 256 GB.
The Galaxy C9 Pro has a much better battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. Google Pixel 3 features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a camera in the back with a lot lower 12.2 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a way higher (4K) video quality and a larger diafragm aperture to take better photos and video in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.