Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with an 80 score against 77.8. Although the Google Pixel 3 is incredibly older and incredibly thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's design is still lighter. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features an incredibly better looking display than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a quite worse display density, it also counts with a lot larger screen and a lot higher resolution of 2200 x 2480.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 512 GB internal memory. Google Pixel 3 counts with a much more powerful processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 96 percent more battery capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a greater camera than Google Pixel 3, because it has a much bigger camera sensor which provides a much better photo and video quality, a much higher 7680x4320 video quality, a way more mega-pixels back facing camera and a larger aperture to take better low light photography.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, Google Pixel 3 is also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.