Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-10-18 | 2021-04-02 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 439 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has a score of 80, which is a little bit better than the vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 score. Even though the Google Pixel 3 is a lot older and a little thicker than the vivo X60 Pro, it's construction is still somewhat lighter. The Google Pixel 3 has a bit better display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2160px, it also counts with a bit greater pixel density.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM memory. The vivo X60 Pro has a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity. Vivo X60 Pro takes a lot better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a F1.8 camera aperture, the vivo X60 Pro also has better 60 frames per second video frame rates, a lot bigger back camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photographs and a way more MP back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.