Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-10-18 | 2016-09-29 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 5.73 x 2.77 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Gold, Gray, Pink and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 157.00 | $ 345.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 439 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has an overall score of 80, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Mi 5s's general score of 76.4. Although the Google Pixel 3 is just a little heavier than Xiaomi Mi 5s, it's a little thinner and also extremely newer. Xiaomi Mi 5s features just a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 3, although it has a quite worse pixels amount per inch in the screen, a little smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920.
Xiaomi Mi 5s features much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi 5s, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Google Pixel 3 also has more processing cores.
Google Pixel 3 captures clearer pictures and videos than Xiaomi Mi 5s, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor shooting worse quality videos and pictures, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Google Pixel 3 also counts with a larger aperture and a camera with more megapixels.
The Xiaomi Mi 5s counts with a bit better battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Google Pixel 3 is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.