Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| 2018-10-18 | 2018-08-29 |
| 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 157.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 439 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a little bit better than Google Pixel 3, with a general score of 85.5 against 80. Even being the best device in our current comparison, we must highlight that it is also a somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker device. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2246px resolution and a bit larger display.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has more RAM. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a much greater storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 256 GB and more internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 captures a bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, although it has a camera in the back with less mega pixels resolution, a smaller aperture and a lower video resolution, they both have a same size camera sensor. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 2915mAh.
Although Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 3. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the Google Pixel 3, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.