Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2019-05-07 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 167.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 Pro is a bit better than Google Pixel 3a XL, having an 84.9 score against 78.9. The iPhone 11 Pro has iOS 15.x OS, while Google Pixel 3a XL comes with Android 11 OS. IPhone 11 Pro's body has the same thickness than Google Pixel 3a XL, but it is heavier. Apple iPhone 11 Pro counts with a much better looking screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater pixel number in each screen inch and a quite better resolution of 1125 x 2436.
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro features a better processing power than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has less cpu cores , and they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Apple iPhone 11 Pro also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. The iPhone 11 Pro has as much memory to install games and applications as Google Pixel 3a XL, both have exactly the same internal storage capacity.
IPhone 11 Pro counts with a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, although it has a camera with a worse resolution and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, they both have the same aperture and a same size back-facing camera sensor. Google Pixel 3a XL features longer battery life than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has a 3700mAh battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone 11 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 3a XL. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the Google Pixel 3a XL, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.