Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x |
| 2019-05-07 | 2022-03-18 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.08 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 167.00 | $ 429.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone SE (2022) is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3a XL, having an 86.6 score against 78.9. Apple iPhone SE (2022)'s body is extremely newer, lighter and a little bit thinner than the Google Pixel 3a XL. The Apple iPhone SE (2022) works with iOS 15.x operating system, and Google Pixel 3a XL works with Android 11 operating system.
IPhone SE (2022) has a better processing unit than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has lesser cores , and they both have the same RAM amount, the iPhone SE (2022) also counts with a 64-bit CPU. IPhone SE (2022) features a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 3a XL, although it has a way smaller screen, a way worse resolution of 750 x 1334 and a little inferior amount of pixels per inch of display.
IPhone SE (2022) features a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, although it has a less MP back facing camera and a lower (4K) video quality, they both have a F1.8 camera aperture. The iPhone SE (2022)'s storage to install applications and games is just as good as Google Pixel 3a XL's one, both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity.
Google Pixel 3a XL has a really longer battery lifetime than iPhone SE (2022), because it has an 83 percent bigger battery size.
Although iPhone SE (2022) is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3a XL. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the Google Pixel 3a XL, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.