Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-07 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 167.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a XL is a bit better than LG V20, with a 78.9 score against 77. Google Pixel 3a XL's construction is much newer and a bit lighter than the LG V20's, but it's also a bit thicker. The Google Pixel 3a XL features a little better performance than LG V20, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Google Pixel 3a XL also has a higher number of cores.
LG V20 has a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better pixel amount per screen inch. The LG V20 captures a little bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing worse quality images, and they both have the same aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG V20 also counts with a back camera with a much better resolution.
LG V20 counts with a very superior storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the LG V20 also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 3a XL counts with just a little better battery life than LG V20, because it has a 16 percent more battery size.
Although Google Pixel 3a XL is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V20. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Google Pixel 3a XL, but if you don't you can save some money and get the LG V20, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.