Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 167.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 has an overall score of 81.2, which is slightly better than Google Pixel 3a XL's overall score of 78.9. Motorola Edge 50's design is much newer and a little thinner than the Google Pixel 3a XL's, although it is also just a bit heavier. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 has the newer 14 version while Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a much better display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a higher resolution of 1220 x 2712 pixels, a quite better display density and a bit larger screen. The Google Pixel 3a XL features a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 takes much clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same video resolution, a same size diafragm aperture and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a much more MP back-facing camera and a way larger back camera sensor taking way better quality photos.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a much greater memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 192 GB more internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 counts with better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.