Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Mystic indigo |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 167.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G Stylus has a global score of 79.7, which is a bit better than the Google Pixel 3a XL's 78.9 overall score. Both of these devices come with the same Android 11 operating system. The Moto G Stylus body is newer than the Google Pixel 3a XL's, but it is somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. Moto G Stylus's processor is just as good as Google Pixel 3a XL's CPU, both of them have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus and Google Pixel 3a XL both count with very similar displays, because although the Motorola Moto G Stylus has a little inferior pixel count in each inch in the display, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2300 pixels resolution and a bit larger screen. Moto G Stylus counts with a superior camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the Moto G Stylus also has a back camera with a much better 48 mega pixels resolution, a larger aperture to take better low light photography and a much larger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Moto G Stylus has a much better memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Moto G Stylus counts with just a bit better battery duration than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Moto G Stylus is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 3a XL. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Google Pixel 3a XL, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.