Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android |
| 2019-05-07 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 167.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | TFT |
| 402 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 has a score of 84.7, which is a bit better than Google Pixel 3a XL's overall score of 78.9. Samsung Galaxy A32's design is newer than Google Pixel 3a XL's, but it is somewhat heavier and thicker. Samsung Galaxy A32 comes with Android OS, and Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11 OS.
The Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a much higher 1080 x 2160 resolution. Google Pixel 3a XL and Samsung Galaxy A32 both have extremely similar CPUs, both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM amount.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a better camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a F1.8 aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a back camera with lot more mega-pixels. The Samsung Galaxy A32 features a much bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A32 has superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.