Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-07 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 167.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A80 is a bit better than Google Pixel 3a XL, with an 84.9 score against 78.9. The Samsung Galaxy A80 is a better cellphone than the Google Pixel 3a XL, it must be told that it is also a heavier and thicker cellphone. Galaxy A80 has a bit better CPU than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A80 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A80 and Google Pixel 3a XL both count with extremely similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy A80 has a just a bit inferior number of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. The Galaxy A80 has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 128 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy A80 captures much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting images or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A80 also counts with a much better 48 MP resolution camera in the back and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
Galaxy A80 has a battery duration that is just as good as the battery duration in Google Pixel 3a XL.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.