Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 167.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a XL has a score of 78.9, which is slightly better than vivo X60 Pro's global score of 78.8. Both of these phones use the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so they should provide the same operating system features. Google Pixel 3a XL's design is just a little bit lighter than vivo X60 Pro, although it's a little bit thicker and was released around a year before.
The vivo X60 Pro has just a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a little less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little larger display and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2376. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
Vivo X60 Pro has a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM. The vivo X60 Pro captures greater photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same camera aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the vivo X60 Pro also has a much larger back-facing camera sensor, a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and faster video frame rates.
Vivo X60 Pro has just a bit better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 4200mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.