Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-07 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 167.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a general score of 85.5, which is slightly better than the Google Pixel 3a XL's overall score of 78.9. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a just a little bit heavier and just a little thicker phone than the Google Pixel 3a XL. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a little better processing power than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features just a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same pixels density, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a quite larger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2246. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has an external memory slot that admits up to 256 GB and 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, although it has a worse 12 megapixels resolution back camera, a lower video definition and a smaller camera aperture, they both have a 0.39 inches camera sensor. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3a XL. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Xiaomi Pocophone F1, else you can save some money and get the Google Pixel 3a XL, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.