Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2019-05-07 | 2019-09-20 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 11 Pro is a little bit better than Google Pixel 3a, having an 84.9 score against 78.8. Apple iPhone 11 Pro has iOS 15.x OS, while Google Pixel 3a works with Android 11 OS. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro is a notably heavier cellphone than Google Pixel 3a, but both are equally thin. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro counts with a much better screen than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a little larger display, a slightly better resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels and a quite better number of pixels per inch of screen.
Google Pixel 3a and iPhone 11 Pro both count with similar memory to install games and applications, they have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity. The iPhone 11 Pro counts with a better performance than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has lesser processing cores (although they are faster), and they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the iPhone 11 Pro also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3a, although it has a less mega-pixels back-facing camera and a lower video resolution, they both have a 0.39 inches back-facing camera sensor and a F1.8 aperture. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 3046mAh of battery capacity.
Although iPhone 11 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3a. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the iPhone 11 Pro, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Google Pixel 3a, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.