Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x |
| 2019-05-07 | 2022-03-18 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 5.08 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | $ 429.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone SE (2022) has a global score of 86.6, which is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3a's 78.8 general score. IPhone SE (2022)'s construction is extremely newer, just a little thinner and just a little bit lighter than Google Pixel 3a. IPhone SE (2022) counts with iOS 15.x operating system, while Google Pixel 3a works with Android 11 operating system.
IPhone SE (2022) has a display that is very similar to the display in Google Pixel 3a, although the iPhone SE (2022) has a quite smaller display, a way worse resolution of 750 x 1334 and a lot lower pixel number per inch of screen. IPhone SE (2022)'s storage capacity for apps and games is very similar to the Google Pixel 3a one, both of them have equal internal storage capacity.
The iPhone SE (2022) counts with a superior processing power than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster), and they both have the same RAM amount, the iPhone SE (2022) also counts with a 64-bit CPU. Apple iPhone SE (2022) features a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a, although it has a worse video definition and a camera in the back with less megapixels, they both have a same size diafragm aperture.
The Google Pixel 3a features a much better battery life than iPhone SE (2022), because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone SE (2022) is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3a. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Apple iPhone SE (2022), else you can save some money and get the Google Pixel 3a, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.