Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-07 | 2016-09-29 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a is a little bit better than LG V20, getting a global score of 78.8 against 77. The Google Pixel 3a is a way newer and somewhat lighter device than the LG V20, although it is just a little bit thicker. Google Pixel 3a features a little faster processor than LG V20, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Google Pixel 3a also has a greater number of cores.
The LG V20 counts with a slightly better looking screen than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a little bit larger display, a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a little bit better screen density. The LG V20 has a lot bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V20 also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V20 features just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor taking less light and duller colors, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same video quality and the same aperture, the LG V20 also counts with a much more MP camera in the back.
The LG V20 features just a bit better battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 7 percent more battery size.
Although Google Pixel 3a is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V20. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Google Pixel 3a, else you can save some dollars and get the LG V20, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.