Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-07 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is a bit better than the Google Pixel 3a, having a general score of 83.7 against 78.8. Despite being the best in this review, we must note that it is also just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but LG V50 ThinQ has an older 10 version and Google Pixel 3a has Android 11.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a slightly better looking screen than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a just a bit better amount of pixels per inch of screen, a little bigger screen and a better 1440 x 3120 resolution. The LG V50 ThinQ features a little better performance than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM.
LG V50 ThinQ has a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a tinier back-facing camera sensor and a worse resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture. LG V50 ThinQ has a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V50 ThinQ has improved battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
LG V50 ThinQ costs more money than Google Pixel 3a, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.