Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android |
| 2019-05-07 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 186.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | TFT |
| 441 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has an overall score of 84.7, which is slightly better than Google Pixel 3a's general score of 78.8. Samsung Galaxy A32's design is newer than Google Pixel 3a's, but it's somewhat thicker and noticeably heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A32 has Android OS, and Google Pixel 3a works with Android 11 OS.
The Samsung Galaxy A32's CPU is very similar to the processor in Google Pixel 3a, both of them have 8 cores and the same RAM amount. Google Pixel 3a counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2220 and a much better pixel count per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A32 captures better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, a F1.8 aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A32 also has a camera with a much higher resolution.
Galaxy A32 counts with a way better battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 67% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.