Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-07 | 2019-06-20 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A60 is just a bit better than Google Pixel 3a, getting a general score of 82.3 against 78.8. Galaxy A60's design is somewhat heavier but just a little bit thinner than the Google Pixel 3a, and they were only released with a few months difference. Both phones we are comparing come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System).
Galaxy A60 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A60 also has 2 GB more RAM. The Google Pixel 3a has a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy A60, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2220 pixels resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit better screen density.
The Samsung Galaxy A60 shoots clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor which provides a lower photo and video quality, and they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A60 also counts with a larger aperture to take better low light photos and videos and a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A60 features a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A60 features a bit superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 13 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.