Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android |
| 2019-05-07 | 2019-09-04 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Black and White |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 186.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A90 5G is much better than the Google Pixel 3a, getting a 90.5 score against 78.8. Galaxy A90 5G has Android operating system, while Google Pixel 3a works with Android 11 operating system. Although it's the best we compare here, the Galaxy A90 5G body is a bit thicker and much heavier than the Google Pixel 3a.
The Google Pixel 3a has a little bit better screen than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a little smaller display and a little bit lower 1080 x 2220px resolution, it also counts with a just a bit higher display pixel density. The Galaxy A90 5G counts with a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a bit better processor than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G captures much better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for shooting photographs and video in low-light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a lot larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much higher 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.