Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-05-07 | 2017-02-24 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Black and Gold |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is slightly better than the Google Pixel 3a, with a score of 81 against 78.8. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's body is thinner than Google Pixel 3a, although it is extremely heavier and was released many years before. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has 6.0 Marshmallow version and Google Pixel 3a has Android 11 version, so it provides the user some extra features.
The Galaxy C9 Pro has a processor that is just as good as the Google Pixel 3a one, and although the Galaxy C9 Pro has a larger amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Google Pixel 3a counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2220 pixels and a little bit greater pixels number per inch in the display.
The Google Pixel 3a has a slightly better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a lot worse resolution back camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light images and videos and a lot better video definition. Galaxy C9 Pro has a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy C9 Pro also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB.
Galaxy C9 Pro features better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 33 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.