Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2015-08-13 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S6 edge+ is just a bit better than Google Pixel 3a, having a 79.3 score against 78.8. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S6 edge+ has older 5.1 version and Google Pixel 3a has Android 11 version. The Galaxy S6 edge+ body is thinner than the Google Pixel 3a, although it is just a little heavier and was released many years before.
Galaxy S6 edge+ features a much better looking screen than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a just a little better pixels density, a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a little bit larger display. The Google Pixel 3a counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Google Pixel 3a also has a higher number of cores (although they are slower).
Galaxy S6 edge+ takes clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light captures and a tinier camera sensor offering a lower image quality, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy S6 edge+ also counts with a back facing camera with a much higher 16 mega pixels resolution.
The Galaxy S6 edge+'s memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos is very similar to the Google Pixel 3a one, they have equal internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ and Google Pixel 3a feature very similar batteries duration.
Although Galaxy S6 edge+ is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 3a. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy S6 edge+, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Google Pixel 3a, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.