Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2021-04-02 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a is slightly better than the vivo X60 Pro, having a 78.8 score against 78.8. Despite of the fact Google Pixel 3a is older and just a bit thicker than vivo X60 Pro, it's design is still somewhat lighter. Both of these devices work with the same Android 11 operating system. Vivo X60 Pro has a bit faster processor than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Vivo X60 Pro has a screen that's very similar to the Google Pixel 3a one, because although the vivo X60 Pro has a bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2376 and a bigger screen. Vivo X60 Pro counts with a very superior camera than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same camera aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the vivo X60 Pro also has a camera with a much higher resolution, a much larger camera sensor shooting way better quality pictures and better video frame rates.
The vivo X60 Pro has a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity. The vivo X60 Pro has a much better battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.