Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-07 | 2018-08-29 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is slightly better than the Google Pixel 3a, with an 85.5 score against 78.8. Although it's the best in this comparison review, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a just a little thicker and heavier device than Google Pixel 3a. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a quite worse screen density, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2246 resolution and a little bigger display.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 256 GB internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 256 GB.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has better battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3000mAh. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 captures slightly better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a, although it has a tinier camera aperture, a worse resolution camera and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, they both have a 0.39 inches back-facing camera sensor.
Although Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 3a. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Xiaomi Pocophone F1, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Google Pixel 3a, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.