Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2019-10-24 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 Pro is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 4 XL, getting a score of 84.9 against 82.9. IPhone 11 Pro is a a little lighter cellphone than the Google Pixel 4 XL, but both have the same thickness. Apple iPhone 11 Pro features just a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
IPhone 11 Pro has a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 4 XL, although it has a much lower resolution of 1125 x 2436px, a little smaller screen and a little bit lower pixel density. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro's memory for games and applications is very similar to Google Pixel 4 XL's one, both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity.
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4 XL, although it has a worse 3840x2160 video quality, a back camera with a worse resolution and a smaller camera aperture which is not good for taking photographs or videos in poorly lited situations, they both have a 0.39 inches sensor.
Google Pixel 4 XL counts with better battery duration than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity against 3046mAh.
Although iPhone 11 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 4 XL, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 4 XL. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Google Pixel 4 XL, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.