Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a general score of 82.9, which is a bit better than the Google Nexus 6P's score of 80.3. Even though the Google Pixel 4 XL is newer than Google Nexus 6P, it's a bit heavier and a bit thicker. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with just a bit better performance than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has 3 GB more RAM.
Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit more vivid display than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a bit bigger display, a slightly better 1440 x 3040 resolution and a just a little better count of pixels in each inch in the display. Google Nexus 6P counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 128 GB internal storage.
Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a little better battery duration than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity against 3450mAh. Google Nexus 6P counts with a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures and videos in low light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Google Nexus 6P also counts with a back-facing camera with a higher 12.3 megapixels resolution and a larger sensor.
The Google Pixel 4 XL not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.