Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL is a little bit better than LG V20, with an 82.9 score against 77. The Google Pixel 4 XL is a extremely newer device than the LG V20, although it's just a bit thicker and just a bit heavier. Google Pixel 4 XL features a little more vivid display than LG V20, because it has a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3040, a bit bigger display and a just a little more pixels per screen inch.
Google Pixel 4 XL features a bit more powerful processor than LG V20, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and 4 more cpu cores. LG V20 captures a bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and a smaller back camera sensor which gives a lower photo and video quality, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the LG V20 also counts with a camera with a way better resolution.
LG V20 has a way bigger storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the LG V20 also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a little longer battery performance than LG V20, because it has a 3700mAh battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG V20. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Google Pixel 4 XL, otherwise you can save some money and get the LG V20, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.