Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a general score of 82.9, which is slightly better than LG V30's overall score of 79.1. The Google Pixel 4 XL body is a lot newer than LG V30's, although it is somewhat heavier and a bit thicker. The Google Pixel 4 XL features a bit better looking screen than LG V30, because although it has a just a bit lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels and a little bigger screen.
LG V30 counts with a way bigger memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V30 also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with just a bit better hardware performance than LG V30, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has more RAM.
The Google Pixel 4 XL features a bit longer battery performance than LG V30, because it has a 12% larger battery capacity. The LG V30 takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier camera sensor shooting worse quality photos and videos, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG V30 also counts with a much more mega-pixels back camera and a larger camera aperture to capture better low light captures and videos.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG V30, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V30. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Google Pixel 4 XL, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the LG V30, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.