Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL has a score of 82.9, which is slightly better than the Motorola Droid Turbo's score of 76.4. Google Pixel 4 XL's design is noticeably newer and noticeably thinner than Motorola Droid Turbo's, although it's also just a bit heavier. Google Pixel 4 XL features a bit faster processor than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with 3 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a better display than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit lower 2560 x 1440px resolution, it also counts with a little bit higher amount of pixels per display inch. Google Pixel 4 XL has much more storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 64 GB internal storage.
The Motorola Droid Turbo shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for capturing photographs and/or video in poorly lited situations and lower 24 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a much more mega pixels back camera.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a little better battery duration than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 5% larger battery size.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Droid Turbo. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the Motorola Droid Turbo, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.