Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a score of 82.9, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50's general score of 81.2. Even though the Google Pixel 4 XL is a better cellphone than the Motorola Edge 50, it must be told that it's also an extremely older, a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker cellphone.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a bit inferior pixels number in each inch of screen and a quite lower resolution of 1220 x 2712px, it also counts with a quite bigger screen. Motorola Edge 50 features a superior storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Motorola Edge 50 has superior battery duration than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 35% more battery size. The Motorola Edge 50 shoots much clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a way larger sensor which provides a lot higher photo and video quality and a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.