Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 487.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL has an overall score of 82.9, which is slightly better than Motorola Moto G Stylus's overall score of 79.7. Even though the Google Pixel 4 XL and the Motorola Moto G Stylus were released with only a couple of months difference, Google Pixel 4 XL's design is just a bit heavier but thinner than the Motorola Moto G Stylus.
The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit superior CPU than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Google Pixel 4 XL features a little more vivid screen than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3040 resolution and a greater pixels density.
Moto G Stylus counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB. Motorola Moto G Stylus takes much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a way bigger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photos and a lot better resolution camera in the back.
Motorola Moto G Stylus has just a bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto G Stylus, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G Stylus. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Google Pixel 4 XL, otherwise you can save some money and get the Moto G Stylus, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.