Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2020-12-21 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 487.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL has an overall score of 82.9, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A12's 80.3 score. Even though Google Pixel 4 XL is older than Galaxy A12, it's design is just a little bit thinner and just a little bit lighter. Google Pixel 4 XL has a lot better looking display than Galaxy A12, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way greater pixel density and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels.
The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy A12, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy A12 has just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for taking photographs and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Galaxy A12 also counts with a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
Samsung Galaxy A12 has a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A12 also has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1 TB. Galaxy A12 counts with superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.