Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android |
| 2019-10-24 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 487.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | TFT |
| 534 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 has a general score of 84.7, which is a bit better than the Google Pixel 4 XL's general score of 82.9. Although the Galaxy A32 is newer than Google Pixel 4 XL, it's somewhat thicker and just a little bit heavier. The Google Pixel 4 XL has a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels and a much better screen pixel density.
Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A32 has a better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light photos and video, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also counts with a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
The Galaxy A32 counts with a superior memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A32 also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with greater battery duration than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.