Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-24 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL has an overall score of 82.9, which is a bit better than Galaxy A60's 82.3 global score. Even being the best device in this review, the Google Pixel 4 XL body is just a bit thicker and heavier than Galaxy A60. The Google Pixel 4 XL features just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A60. Both have a 6 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Google Pixel 4 XL features just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A60, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a higher display density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040. The Galaxy A60 has a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor giving a lower image quality, and they both have the same aperture, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A60 also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
Galaxy A60 features a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity against 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.