Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android |
| 2019-10-24 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 487.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G is slightly better than Google Pixel 4 XL, having a overall score of 90.5 against 82.9. Although the Galaxy A90 5G is better than the Google Pixel 4 XL, it must be told that it's also a a little heavier and just a little bit thicker cellphone. The Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3040 resolution and a better pixels count per inch in the display.
The Galaxy A90 5G counts with a CPU that's just as good as the processing unit in Google Pixel 4 XL, they have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting photographs or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs and a camera in the back with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy A90 5G has better battery life than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.