Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a score of 82.9, which is a bit better than Galaxy S6 edge+'s global score of 79.3. Although Google Pixel 4 XL is way newer than the Galaxy S6 edge+, it is way heavier and thicker. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a superior processing power than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a larger number of faster cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a slightly better display than Google Pixel 4 XL, although it has a little lower resolution of 2560 x 1440px, a bit smaller display and a just a little worse pixel density. The Galaxy S6 edge+'s memory capacity to install games and applications is just as good as the Google Pixel 4 XL one, they have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage.
Galaxy S6 edge+ captures a bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller sensor which gives a worse image and video quality and a smaller aperture which is worse for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy S6 edge+ also counts with a much higher 16 megapixels resolution camera.
Google Pixel 4 XL has better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 3700mAh battery size.
The Google Pixel 4 XL costs a bit more money than the Galaxy S6 edge+, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.