Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-24 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL is slightly better than the vivo X60 Pro, having a score of 82.9 against 78.8. Although it's the best we are comparing, the Google Pixel 4 XL is an older, just a little bit heavier and just a little bit thicker device than the vivo X60 Pro. The vivo X60 Pro features a little faster CPU than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a little more vivid display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3040 resolution and a greater display density. Vivo X60 Pro captures much better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a lot bigger sensor which offers a much higher photo and video quality, a lot better resolution camera and higher video frame rate.
The vivo X60 Pro features a superior memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.