Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.9 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 487.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is slightly better than Google Pixel 4 XL, with a general score of 85.5 against 82.9. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is an older and just a little thicker cellphone than the Google Pixel 4 XL, but Xiaomi could make it just a little bit lighter anyway. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 and Google Pixel 4 XL have incredibly similar CPUs, and although the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a larger amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a bit bigger display, more pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040px. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 shoots clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a camera in the back with lesser mega-pixels and a smaller aperture which is worse for taking photos in low light environments, they both have a 0.39 inches sensor.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 256 GB and more internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a bit better battery performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.