Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2015-11-02 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a global score of 81.9, which is slightly better than the Google Nexus 6P's score of 80.3. Google Pixel 4's design is way newer and just a little bit lighter than the Google Nexus 6P's, but it's also a little bit thicker. Google Nexus 6P features a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Google Nexus 6P also has a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a just a little better pixel count in each inch in the screen.
The Google Nexus 6P features a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because it has more internal storage. The Google Pixel 4 features just a little better hardware performance than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Google Nexus 6P features longer battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has 3450mAh of battery capacity. The Google Nexus 6P shoots a bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking photos and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Google Nexus 6P also counts with a bigger back camera sensor shooting better quality photographs and a camera in the back with more mega-pixels.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Google Pixel 4 is also a lot cheaper, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.