Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has a general score of 81.9, which is just a bit better than Google Pixel 2's 81.6 overall score. The Google Pixel 4 body is noticeably newer than Google Pixel 2's, although it's somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker. The Google Pixel 4 features a slightly better looking display than Google Pixel 2, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a just a little higher count of pixels per inch in the display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2280 resolution.
The Google Pixel 2 features much more memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 4 features just a little better performance than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 2 features a camera that is just as good as the camera in Google Pixel 4, and although the Google Pixel 2 has a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures or video in poorly lited environments and a tinier back camera sensor capturing less light and duller colors, they both have the same video definition, a back-facing camera with a 12.2 mega pixels resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates.
Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit superior battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 4 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel 4 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 2. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Google Pixel 4, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Google Pixel 2, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.