Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| 2019-10-24 | 2016-10-20 |
| 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 339.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 443 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has an overall score of 81.9, which is a little bit better than Google Pixel XL's 81.3 general score. The Google Pixel 4 design is extremely newer, just a bit lighter and just a little thinner than the Google Pixel XL. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a little better processing power than Google Pixel XL, because it has 2 GB more RAM and 4 more cores.
The Google Pixel XL features a little sharper display than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a little bit better number of pixels per display inch. Google Pixel XL's camera is just as good as the camera in Google Pixel 4, because although the Google Pixel XL has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, it also counts with a back facing camera with a higher resolution and a bigger camera sensor taking better quality videos and photographs.
Google Pixel XL counts with much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has more internal memory. Google Pixel XL has improved battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has 3450mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Google Pixel 4 is also a bargain compared to others, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.